Endoscopic Vs Microscopic Pituitary Tumor Surgery

Pdf Comparison Between Endoscopic And Microscopic Approaches For Introduction. rapid progressive pituitary adenomas is one of the most common intracranial tumors, constituting nearly 10% of intracranial tumors ().it often leads to abnormal secretion of pituitary hormones, abnormal vision, and other nerve and brain damages, and ultimately endanger the life of patients. Pituitary surgery has been an effective treatment for pituitary tumors with good outcomes, essentially since the operating microscope was introduced as a visual aid in the 1960s by guiot and hardy. 1 microscopic surgery (ms) techniques prevailed until the introduction of endoscopic surgery (es) techniques in the early 1990s, and recently, es techniques have become the more popular way to.

Endoscopic Vs Microscopic Pituitary Tumor Surgery Youtube The hpt axis was intact preoperatively in 55% of patients in the endoscopic group vs. 61% in the microscopic group (table 1).new tsh dependent deficiencies developed after surgery in 15% of. Request an appointment. 410 955 5000 maryland. 855 695 4872 outside of maryland. 1 410 502 7683 international. the pituitary gland is located at the bottom of your brain and above the inside of your nose. endoscopic pituitary surgery is the most common surgery used to remove pituitary tumors. The results from our analysis showed that the rate of gtr was significantly higher in the endoscopic group than in the microscopic group (71.8% versus 58.0%). unfortunately, a subgroup analysis of the gtr based on the size of the pituitary adenoma was not feasible in our analysis because of the lack of available data. Mean duration of surgery was 86 min (77–95) with the endoscopic technique vs. 106 min (101–111) with the microscopic technique, p < 0.001. new hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal axis.

Pdf Endoscopic Versus Microscopic Transsphenoidal Pituitary Adenoma The results from our analysis showed that the rate of gtr was significantly higher in the endoscopic group than in the microscopic group (71.8% versus 58.0%). unfortunately, a subgroup analysis of the gtr based on the size of the pituitary adenoma was not feasible in our analysis because of the lack of available data. Mean duration of surgery was 86 min (77–95) with the endoscopic technique vs. 106 min (101–111) with the microscopic technique, p < 0.001. new hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal axis. Mean duration of surgery was 86 min (77 95) with the endoscopic technique vs. 106 min (101 111) with the microscopic technique, p < 0.001. new hypothalamus pituitary adrenal axis deficiencies were observed after 3% of endoscopic vs. 34% microscopic operations, p = 0.001, and overall fewer postoperative pituitary deficiencies were observed in. Microscopic surgery (ms) techniques pre vailed until the introduction of endoscopic surgery (es) techniques in the early 1990s, and recently, es techniques have become the more popular way to remove pituitary tumors in the united states.2,3 data to date have suggested that in some cases, there is an increased percentage of tumor resection.