C Removing Item From Listbox Unhandled Exception In Wpf Stack If you change the type of clientlist from list<client> to observablecollection<client>, you could simply remove the item directly from the source collection: public partial class mainwindow : window. {. observablecollection<client> clientlist = new observablecollection<client>(); public mainwindow() {. Lets say you select 1, 2, 3. first it deletes item 1, your list becomes: then you delete 2: and now you are trying to delete 3, but oops, 3 doesn't exist, out of range! you are deleting items you don't intend to delete. you wanted to delete 1, 2 and 3, but you ended up deleting only 1 and 3, skipping 2. at other times this may delete items (if.
C Removing Item From Listbox Unhandled Exception In Wpf Stack The stack trace mentions a system.windows.controls.datagrid and my application only has one datagrid so i guess it's being caused by removing items from the observablecollection that is bound to the datagrid. my addmessage method is called a result of messages being received on multiple threads, so there's a real possibility that this is a race. When creating a wpf application, one of the best things you can do upfront is add some code to catch any unhandled exceptions. there are numerous ways unhandled exceptions can be caught, and this stack overflow answer shows how you can nicely handle them. one thing i especially like about that answer is they also capture the application’s. However, sometimes even the simplest code can throw an exception, and instead of wrapping every single line of code with a try catch block, wpf lets you handle all unhandled exceptions globally. this is done through the dispatcherunhandledexception event on the application class. if subscribed to, wpf will call the subscribing method once an. Let’s take a look at some of the ways to handle exceptions in a wpf application. here’s a list some of those ways to handle “unhandled” exceptions. appdomain.unhandledexception. the appdomain.unhandledexception or more specifically appdomain.currentdomain.unhandledexception. application.dispatcherunhandledexception.
Visual Studio Code Removing Item From Listbox Unhandled Exception However, sometimes even the simplest code can throw an exception, and instead of wrapping every single line of code with a try catch block, wpf lets you handle all unhandled exceptions globally. this is done through the dispatcherunhandledexception event on the application class. if subscribed to, wpf will call the subscribing method once an. Let’s take a look at some of the ways to handle exceptions in a wpf application. here’s a list some of those ways to handle “unhandled” exceptions. appdomain.unhandledexception. the appdomain.unhandledexception or more specifically appdomain.currentdomain.unhandledexception. application.dispatcherunhandledexception. However, this will only capture exceptions on the ui thread. all other exceptions will look for an event handler on that threads’ stack. if no event handler is found it will bubble up to the appdomain’s handler. so to capture these exceptions you should add an event handler to the appdomain’s unhandledexception event. Solution 1 – if you’re removing items, use removeall () solution 2 – if you’re adding items, put them in a temp and use addrange () solution 3 – use a regular for loop and loop in reverse. scenario 2 – one thread is modifying the collection while another thread is looping over it. solution – use a concurrent collection.
C Easy Way To Refresh Listbox In Wpf Stack Overflow However, this will only capture exceptions on the ui thread. all other exceptions will look for an event handler on that threads’ stack. if no event handler is found it will bubble up to the appdomain’s handler. so to capture these exceptions you should add an event handler to the appdomain’s unhandledexception event. Solution 1 – if you’re removing items, use removeall () solution 2 – if you’re adding items, put them in a temp and use addrange () solution 3 – use a regular for loop and loop in reverse. scenario 2 – one thread is modifying the collection while another thread is looping over it. solution – use a concurrent collection.
Comments are closed.