25 06 Vs 30 06 Help Me Choose Still, in general, the 25 06’s lighter bullet will be faster than the heavier 30 06. the general average for a 30 06 is around 2820 fps against 3120 fps for the 25 06. with any round, a perfect kill shot is effective regardless, but when the shots are not perfect, the effects of more stopping power are noticeable. Though the .30 06 springfield cartridge in the photo is slightly shorter than the .25 06 cartridge, the 30 06 actually has a longer saami maximum authorized overall length of 3.34″ (84.84mm) vs just 3.25″ (82.6mm) for the 25 06. however, the two cartridges are close enough in size that both cartridges are used in standard long action rifles.
25 06 Vs 30 06 Springfield Review Comparison вђў Air Gun Maniac Recoil is a factor many would choose the 25 06 over the 30 06 also. i personally shoot 130gr barnes in my 30 06 for deer size game and 165gr barnes for elk and bigger game. so, i sold my 25 06, the 130gr load is close in everything the 25 06 did, i'm getting 3220fps. with today's bullets i just see no need for 25, 270 etc in the 06 case. To me, the question is between the .25 06 and the .270 or the .270 and the .30 06. if you are trying to decide between the .25 and .30, then the .270 should be the right one. all three, however, are fine. Caliber and cartridge sizes. the 30 06 has a bullet diameter of .308 inches and a case length of 2.494 inches. the 25 06, on the other hand, has a bullet diameter of .257 inches and a case length of 2.494 inches. the 30 06 has a larger case capacity than the 25 06, which means it can hold more powder and generate more velocity. The larger bullet of the 30 06 means the overall length is slightly more at 3.34", but the 25 06 isn't much shorter at 3.25". the 30 06 springfield also has a higher case capacity of 68 grains compared to the 65.8 gr h2o of the 25 06 remington. the maximum pressure (saami) for the 25 06 is 63,000 psi, and the 30 06 max pressure is 60,200 psi.
25 06 Vs 30 06 Help Me Choose Caliber and cartridge sizes. the 30 06 has a bullet diameter of .308 inches and a case length of 2.494 inches. the 25 06, on the other hand, has a bullet diameter of .257 inches and a case length of 2.494 inches. the 30 06 has a larger case capacity than the 25 06, which means it can hold more powder and generate more velocity. The larger bullet of the 30 06 means the overall length is slightly more at 3.34", but the 25 06 isn't much shorter at 3.25". the 30 06 springfield also has a higher case capacity of 68 grains compared to the 65.8 gr h2o of the 25 06 remington. the maximum pressure (saami) for the 25 06 is 63,000 psi, and the 30 06 max pressure is 60,200 psi. Ep 258: 25 06 vs 30 06 cartridge comparison. i have another cartridge comparison for you today where we’ll compare the 25 06 remington and the 30 06 springfield. i think most hunters would agree the legendary 30 06 springfield is an excellent all around hunting cartridge. while it does indeed offer many advantages to hunters, it’s not perfect. Though the .30 06 springfield cartridge in the photo is slightly shorter than the .25 06 cartridge, the 30 06 actually has a longer saami maximum authorized overall length of 3.34″ (84.84mm) vs just 3.25″ (82.6mm) for the 25 06. however, the two cartridges are close enough in size that both cartridges are used in standard long action rifles.
25 06 Vs 30 06 Review Comparison Youtube Ep 258: 25 06 vs 30 06 cartridge comparison. i have another cartridge comparison for you today where we’ll compare the 25 06 remington and the 30 06 springfield. i think most hunters would agree the legendary 30 06 springfield is an excellent all around hunting cartridge. while it does indeed offer many advantages to hunters, it’s not perfect. Though the .30 06 springfield cartridge in the photo is slightly shorter than the .25 06 cartridge, the 30 06 actually has a longer saami maximum authorized overall length of 3.34″ (84.84mm) vs just 3.25″ (82.6mm) for the 25 06. however, the two cartridges are close enough in size that both cartridges are used in standard long action rifles.
Comments are closed.